By Samuel Faris-Clark
The UFC 326 main event between Max Holloway and Charles Oliveira was supposed to be a
violent coronation.
It was a fight for the symbolic “Baddest Motherfcker” title, featuring two of the most exciting finishers in the sport’s history.
Instead, it delivered a tactical masterclass that felt like a betrayal of the BMF spirit, leaving fans and fighters questioning the belt’s very purpose.
A complete stylistic mismatch
Fans anticipated a striking war, a quintessential “BMF” scrap where both men would stand and trade leather.
Charles Oliveira, the most prolific submission artist in UFC history, had other plans. From the opening bell, Oliveira implemented a suffocating, grappling-heavy game plan, repeatedly taking Holloway down with ease.
By the fight’s end, Oliveira had amassed a staggering 20 minutes and 49 seconds of control time, limiting Holloway, who is the UFC’s all-time leader in significant strikes, to a paltry 26 significant strikes.
It was a brilliant performance from a tactical standpoint, but it was a wrestling match, not a BMF fight. The backlash from the MMA community was immediate and brutal.
YOU ALSO MAY LIKE: T20 World Cup news: India crush New Zealand in Ahmedabad to retain title
Opinions from other fighters
The creator of the original BMF belt, Nate Diaz, called both men “Boring Mother Fckers” on
social media.
Conor McGregor labeled it a “shockingly bad fight,” while Luke Rockhold simply tweeted, “I
thought this was BMF belt”.
The sentiment was clear, this methodical ground control did not embody the “stand-and-bang”
ethos the title had come to represent.
Even Oliveira’s teammate Gilbert Burns defended him, arguing that this was simply “MMA,”
highlighting the core conflict the BMF title is about vibes, not just winning .
The fight was a paradox
Oliveira proved he is a legitimate “bad motherf*cker” by utterly dominating a legend, but in doing
so, he may have killed the golden goose.
The BMF title was created to celebrate the chaotic and violent spirit of fighters like Diaz, Jorge
Masvidal and Holloway.
Oliveira’s win was too efficient, too smart, and too safe to live up to that legacy.
It stripped the belt of its mystique, exposing it as just another trinket that can be won by playing
it safe rather than embracing the “anywhere, anytime” violence it was meant to honor.
READ NEXT: F1 analysis: Winners and losers from the 2026 Australian GP – Ferrari, Cadillac and more
Aidan Leo 
Nicole Powell